Logan Paul's CryptoZoo Lawsuit Dismissed
A Texas judge has dismissed the class-action lawsuit filed against Logan Paul regarding his NFT project CryptoZoo. The case was dismissed with prejudice by Judge Albright.
Judge's Ruling and Reasoning
Judge Albright characterized Paul's promises about CryptoZoo as "puffery" rather than fraud. The judge noted that Paul described the project as backed by a "massive team" and funded by "like a million dollars," but these statements were considered exaggerated claims not justifying legal action.
“Defendant Paul’s depiction of the project as one backed by a ‘massive team’ and funded by ‘like a million dollars’ also constitutes puffery,” Albright wrote.
“Puffery” means “an exaggerated, blustering, and boasting statement upon which no reasonable buyer would be justified in relying.”
Possibility of Fraud Noted With More Specifics
The judge added that if Paul had provided a clear launch date for the CryptoZoo game and failed to meet it, those facts could have supported a fraud claim. However, Paul's vague statements did not meet that threshold.
He said if Paul’s claims about getting a CryptoZoo game off the ground hadn’t been so “vague,” and if Paul had promised a hard launch date and failed to deliver, that might have been “material” grounds for fraud.
Background on CryptoZoo
CryptoZoo was launched over four years ago as a hybrid NFT and game project. It began with the sale of digital “eggs,” which were NFTs, and promised a future game where these eggs would hatch into animal images.
- Users could buy eggs as NFTs initially.
- Once the game launched, eggs would hatch into chimera-like animals, many resembling Adobe stock photos.
- Hatched animals would generate $ZOO tokens, CryptoZoo’s cryptocurrency.
- Animals could be bred to create hybrid creatures.
Despite the project’s ambitions, the court found no legal basis to hold Logan Paul liable for fraud under the circumstances.
Author's Summary
The court ruled that Logan Paul's CryptoZoo statements were exaggerated marketing rather than fraud, dismissing the lawsuit due to lack of concrete evidence.
Would you like the text to be more technical or more accessible for general readers?