According to a report in The New York Times, some federal judges are expressing dissatisfaction with the Supreme Court's frequent grants of interim relief to the Trump Administration.
More than three dozen federal judges have shared their concerns with The New York Times, stating that the Supreme Court's brief and opaque emergency orders in cases related to the Trump administration have caused confusion and are damaging the judiciary's public image.
The Supreme Court's flurry of brief, opaque emergency orders ... have left them confused about how to proceed in those matters and are hurting the judiciary's image with the public.
This unusual critique from lower court judges highlights the strain that litigation over Trump's agenda has placed on the federal judicial system.
Author's summary: Federal judges criticize Supreme Court's actions.