Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer Discusses Legal Pragmatism
Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer criticized the reversal of Roe v. Wade, citing it as an example of a decision driven by personal beliefs rather than consideration of the law's broader context.
The decision was made without considering the law's broader context.
During a symposium at Harvard Law School, Breyer compared different methods of legal interpretation, emphasizing the importance of legal pragmatism.
- The event was part of a conference on judicial review hosted by the Harvard Law Review and Texas A&M University Center on the Structural Constitution.
Author's summary: Breyer criticizes Roe v. Wade reversal at HLS symposium.
More News
- Jefferson boys wrestling beats rival Alameda in pin-fest
- Irving Berlin - Overview
- What Mavericks’ Anthony Davis said after getting shut down by Thunder
- Kate Hudson’s Backless Red Sequined Dress Creates a Stunning Optical Illusion
- Gallery | Tigers in trouble after Nagambie knock season-high score
- Semi-truck driver shot on I-55 in Jefferson County, suspect charged
- Vikings' Jefferson: '25 one of most difficult seasons
- Explore the traditions of Jewish Book Month while you wait for Hannukah
- Anthony Davis (Mavericks) sur les tablettes des Bulls ?
- Hudson Couteau de table en acier